![]() ![]() ![]() It’s only been through a couple of major changes (from 3.x to 4.x being the largest), so what it does… it does very well. KDE was one of the first “full-blown” desktop environments for the Linux operating system. If you’re familiar with the standard desktop, you’ll be right at home with Cinnamon. ![]() Cinnamon can be highly tweaked in numerous ways (move panels, add desklets, add/remove effects, and more).īest user for Cinnamon: Anyone. But if you don’t like that look… change it. With a “start button”, panel, and system tray, Cinnamon holds strong to the desktop metaphor that has worked so well for so long. Even though Cinnamon has a decidedly Linux look and feel, any user would instantly be at home working within this environment. Cinnamon allows even more configuration than does GNOME 3 and does a great job of harkening back to GNOME 2, but does so with a nod to a more modern look. What came of that was an interface that seems a melding of GNOME 3 and GNOME 2. So they forked GNOME 3 and completely reworked the interface. CinnamonĬinnamon came to be because the Linux Mint team did not feel the direction of GNOME 3 fit in with theirs. So if you’re looking for a Ubuntu Unity-level modern take on the desktop, but want to be able to tweak it to your tastes, GNOME 3 is for you.īest user for GNOME 3: Somewhat experienced user who wants a modern desktop but still wants to tweak the look and feel. Specifically, the addition of GNOME Shell Extensions helps the end use refine the experience to better match their needs. Where Ubuntu Unity locks down the majority of its interface, GNOME 3 allows for a bit more tinkering. Open the Dash, however, and you find plenty to use. On the surface, you have what looks like very little to interact with. GNOME 3 is a bit of an anomaly – a sort of minimalist approach to a full-featured desktop environment. It’s an incredibly efficient means of interacting with applications.īest user for Ubuntu Unity: New user who wants as much information at their fingertips as possible and doesn’t care too much about a highly individual look and feel to their desktop. Tap the Alt key and type a search string to bring up application menu options. With the help of the Head Up Display (HUD), you no longer have to reach for the mouse to interact with application menus. Ubuntu Unity should also be given serious consideration by any user who prefers to spend most of their time on the keyboard and not switching back and forth between keyboard and mouse. Users who want to be connected and have quick access to social networks, shopping, Wikipedia, and more will find Ubuntu Unity to be a welcome environment. Ubuntu Unity is the ideal desktop for any user wanting a modern interface that connects them to not only their local data, but data from over 100 remote sources. With that said, let’s connect users with desktops. However - getting connected with the right desktop, up front, can go a very long way to ensuring an overall positive experience with the Linux desktop. As well, each desktop offers a wholly unique experience with plenty of features to please anyone. I will examine the following Linux desktops:Įach of the above desktops has a strong following (with good reason). But if you look at each desktop long enough, you discover there is a clear connection between desktop and end user. For most people it’s about taste and features. There are no hard and fast rules, tests to take, or wizards to walk you through to your final Linux desktop destination. To that end, I want to take some of the most popular desktops and match them to end users. I would, contend, however, that there is a desktop for every kind of user to be found within the Linux landscape. Which desktop is the best? Which offers the most user-friendly experience? The questions are not only never-ending, but date back over a decade where the “war” between KDE, GNOME, and every other desktop was given voice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |